Want to know what the GOP thinks of the Demcorats' "Buffett Rule", which would require those earning at least $1 million dollars a year (or more!) to pay at least a 30% tax rate so they can pay the same tax rate as their secretaries? Senate Republicans blocked debate on the measure, ensuring that it won't even come up for a vote. Thanks a lot, cloture!
According to UPI, "The cloture vote failed 51-45 along mostly partisan lines. Sixty votes were needed to end debate on the Paying a Fair Share Act of 2012 and move it to a vote. Prior to the vote, Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., ridiculed the reasoning behind the Buffett Rule, saying it would only open the door to higher taxes on the middle class." You know, the middle class would love to earn over $1 million/year!
The Democrats had said the measure would have generated $47 billion between 2012 and 2022, which would help pay down the deficit. But the measure would have applied to investment income, which is now taxed at a lower rate—that's why Mitt Romney only paid a 13.9% tax rate on over $21 million in investment income in 2010.
The Washington Post points out, "On Thursday, the GOP-led House is scheduled to vote on a counterproposal championed by House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (Va.) that would cut taxes by 20 percent for businesses with 500 or fewer employees. Neither measure will be signed into law; the business tax cut proposal is likely to win approval in the House but be rejected by the Senate. But in a gridlocked Congress, passage was never the point. Instead, both parties aim to force their opponents into the politically uncomfortable position of killing proposals they are convinced are broadly popular." Thanks a lot, politicians! We're just going to watch MoveOn's pro-Buffett Rule ad to feel better because at least we're seeing pictures of fat cats.
