George Costanza called it nearly two decades ago: science still can't find any proof that there is a G-spot. But just because it doesn't exist doesn't mean that it isn't JUST LIKE NYC: "The G-spot is more of a thing like New York City is a thing. It's a region, it's a convergence of many different structures," said Barry Komisaruk, a professor of psychology at Rutgers University who advocates calling it the G-area, or G-region.
The new report, which was published this month in the Journal of Sexual Medicine, is based on a review of 96 published studies over the last 60 years. Two research teams came to the same conclusion: "Without a doubt, a discrete anatomic entity called the G-spot does not exist," said Dr. Amichai Kilchevsky, a urology resident at Yale-New Haven Hospital in Connecticut, and lead author of the review. Kilchevsky believes that women who feel they have G-spots are more likely experiencing "a continuation of the clitoris," and hopes women who can't have orgasms through vaginal penetration understand they "don't have anything wrong with them."
Kilchevsky conceded the work is not "1,000 percent conclusive," which is a serious science term, so don't worry about it. He allows that other scientists might one day locate the Bermuda Triangle of Erogenous Zones, but the technology just hasn't been developed yet, damnit.
